<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Top Tech Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toptechreviews.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toptechreviews.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung and Apple drop claims, but still disagree on many issues</title>
		<link>http://www.toptechreviews.net/tech-news/samsung-and-apple-drop-claims-but-still-disagree-on-many-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toptechreviews.net/tech-news/samsung-and-apple-drop-claims-but-still-disagree-on-many-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptechreviews.net/?p=15467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple filed paperwork on Monday this week that speaks volumes in their lawsuit against Samsung over patent infringement.  The company filed in California to have the claims against Samsung cut nearly in half, prompting Samsung to drop claims against Apple only 5 hours later.  Samsung argued that Apple&#8217;s case is still to large to go ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toptechreviews.net/tech-news/samsung-and-apple-drop-claims-but-still-disagree-on-many-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google infringed on Oracle patents according to jury</title>
		<link>http://www.toptechreviews.net/tech-tips/google-infringed-on-oracle-patents-according-to-jury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toptechreviews.net/tech-tips/google-infringed-on-oracle-patents-according-to-jury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptechreviews.net/?p=15462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal jury sat through closing arguments this week and found that Google did, in fact, infringe on patents that are currently owned by Oracle.  The issue is that the jury could not answer whether Google&#8217;s argument that using the API&#8217;s was permitted under the legal concept of &#8220;fair use&#8221;.  Fair use allows the use ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toptechreviews.net/tech-tips/google-infringed-on-oracle-patents-according-to-jury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung i300 Smartphone with Large Memory</title>
		<link>http://www.toptechreviews.net/mobiles-phones/smartphones/samsung-i300-smartphone-with-large-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toptechreviews.net/mobiles-phones/smartphones/samsung-i300-smartphone-with-large-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Matias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[240 by 320 pixels resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3 GB internal memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G network support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HQ display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steering control button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptechreviews.net/?p=15447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Samsung i300 is the model Windows Mobile OS smartphone in 2005. It features a 3 GB internal memory, HQ display, a steering control button, and a lot more. It also has a megapixel camera, which is standard for smartphones during that time. It runs on Microsoft Windows Mobile 2003 OS Second Edition. It is ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toptechreviews.net/mobiles-phones/smartphones/samsung-i300-smartphone-with-large-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle and Google Lawyers Give Closing Arguments</title>
		<link>http://www.toptechreviews.net/google/oracle-and-google-lawyers-give-closing-arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toptechreviews.net/google/oracle-and-google-lawyers-give-closing-arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Matias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closing arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high tech industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers for Google and Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptechreviews.net/?p=15454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers for Google and Oracle gave their closing arguments last Monday in the jury trial over the use of Java software code. The results of the trial could have a ripple effect across the high tech industry. Oracle claimed that Google copied the Java code without a license when it made the Android operating system. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toptechreviews.net/google/oracle-and-google-lawyers-give-closing-arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BenQ-Siemens EF81Thin like the RAZR</title>
		<link>http://www.toptechreviews.net/mobiles-phones/smartphones/benq-siemens-ef81thin-like-the-razr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.toptechreviews.net/mobiles-phones/smartphones/benq-siemens-ef81thin-like-the-razr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Matias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional clamshell handset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola’s RAZR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slim clamshell EF81]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wallpapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptechreviews.net/?p=15439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BenQ-Siemens released the slim clamshell EF81 in 2006. It looked like Motorola’s RAZR and there were consumers who thought that it was a new RAZR model when it was first unveiled. But aside from the first impression of being a copycat, the EF81 has a lot more to offer to its users. The BenQ-Siemens EF81 ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toptechreviews.net/mobiles-phones/smartphones/benq-siemens-ef81thin-like-the-razr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

